UK

There will be no soft Brexit for Britain’s poorest

27 October Oct 2016 0840 27 October 2016

According to the leading academic Kenneth Armstrong, vulnerable and disadvantaged people in the UK are already suffering as a result of Brexit

  • ...
Uk Poor
  • ...

According to the leading academic Kenneth Armstrong, vulnerable and disadvantaged people in the UK are already suffering as a result of Brexit

Speaking at a Poverty Alliance conference on poverty human rights in Glasgow, the academic – a professor of EU law – called for an independent audit to ensure the rights of disadvantaged people were safeguarded after Brexit.

He said: “Brexit isn’t just about cutting ourselves off from the single market. It means the UK will no longer be bound by the EU’s Human Rights Charter and legislation.

Professor Kenneth Armstrong of the University of Cambridge said the impacts of Britain’s decision to leave the European Union (EU) are already being felt in the country’s poorest communities.
These include rising prices – especially for food – and wages that are falling behind inflation, leaving many people worse off than they were before the referendum.

Post-Brexit, Armstrong cautioned, there will be a “real risk” of increased inequality, division and xenophobia as the UK “cut its tether” with EU legislation.

Kenneth Armstrong

Speaking at a Poverty Alliance conference on poverty human rights in Glasgow, the academic – a professor of EU law – called for an independent audit to ensure the rights of disadvantaged people were safeguarded after Brexit.
He said: “Brexit isn’t just about cutting ourselves off from the single market. It means the UK will no longer be bound by the EU’s Human Rights Charter and legislation.

“There are real risks to human dignity, to equality and discrimination, especially on grounds of nationality, to social protection and to food and fuel security.

“It won’t be a soft Brexit for those who are dependent.

Leave campaigners, he noted, had “left the stage” since the vote to leave in June.

“An audit would hold them to account,” he said. “We were repeatedly told by the leave campaign that we’d be better off. But no-one from the campaign can be held to account on this. An audit must find who is gaining from Brexit – and who is losing.”

Armstrong went on to say that although the UK was leaving the EU’s legal framework on human rights, it was important that organisations and governments continued to work across borders to tackle poverty and exclusion.

The conference also heard from Dr Ima Jackson, from the Glasgow Refugee Asylum and Migration Network, who said she had noticed increased feelings of hostility towards migrants since the EU referendum.

Branding UK Government anti-immigrant rhetoric as “dangerous and careless”, Jackson said many projects supporting refugees were struggling to find support and funding after the leave vote. “Initiatives that support migrants have learned not to speak too loudly,” she said. “They’ve learned that if they do, then things get precarious.“Migrants are ultimately competing for resources – after Brexit, that’s going to be even more difficult.”

Dr Andrew Fraser, NHS Scotland’s director of public health, told the conference human rights needed to be at the heart of the battle against poverty.

He welcomed the Scottish Government’s Fairer Scotland campaign, but cautioned that it must be weighed against the “swirling tide” of the risks of Brexit. “We need to take this opportunity to seize the moment,” he said. “Nicola Sturgeon has indicated her commitment to including human rights in legislation. NHS Scotland’s approach is also increasingly driven by human rights. Tackling inequality will become a core part of what we do.It’s a hard road to tread for our political leadership. But it’s the right way to go. It will set up our country to be better and fairer. We’re on the right road, and doing better for that.”

The article was published on TFN (Third Force News, the voice of Scotland third sector)

Cover Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

Related news